|
Forced Induction
an is that animal which consciously grasps the
function of his mind and seeks to augment it by
empiricalization and rationalization.
Empiricalization is the active, willed collection of
facts from the external environment.
Rationalization is the formation of empirically
unwarranted concepts.
That is, a man (in forming concepts) attempts to:
Place a symbol on an unfilled 'bucket'.
Extrapolate (guess) the structure and
relationships of percept(s) from the contents of
that unfilled bucket.
Discern a recurring figure from fewer data
points than the number dictated by the empirically
obtained context for 'degree of probability'.
This function is forced induction and requires
mental 'effort'.
The effort consists of concentration which is the
holding of the mind's focus on a specific subject
(unworded thought). In the absence of effort the
focus wanders, being continually buffetted by
external data. Thus, 'thinking' requires the
cutting off of some external input. (Or, thought
is 'constrained' mental activity - selective and
insulated.)
Random wandering of the focus is the default
condition of the mind. This must be so in order to
detect a threat, food, etc . The brain scans the
environment for important data. But it must be
able to hold the focus in order to meet the threat
or catch the food.
All animals 'concentrate' on external input.
A human (that which is like a man but not quite a man) does it with internal concepts (deduction).
A man concentrates in the process of forced
induction.
There are three fundamental levels of forced
induction.
First degree forced induction is what an artist
does while drawing a picture.
Its meaning is roughly this:
Given a system of one billion combinations of which
only one million are desirable, find one.
Second degree forced induction is what a scientist
does.
Its meaning is:
Given a system of one billion possibilities and one
unique solution, find that one.
Third degree forced induction is what a research
mathematician does.
Its meaning is:
Construct a System or process which will account
for the one billion possibilities.
The last is most difficult because, in principle,
it is without formal methodology.
The difficulty of the second lies in learning the
discipline of experimentation.
The first requires an approximation with successive
improvements acting as the guide to further
improvements.
Note: Induction and deduction are inseparable
in practice (deduction being the conscious
mechanism of verifying induction).
|